Reconstruction talk:Latin/voleo

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Kwékwlos in topic Attested

RFD discussion: January 2022

edit
 

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Request to undelete Reconstruction:Latin/voleo and Reconstruction:Latin/volere. They are linked from many etymology sections, and are a key link in understanding the derivation of forms such as Italian voglio, volere from Latin volo, velle. They were deleted by Rua as "duplicates" of the attested Classical forms, which is a weak reason to summarily delete an entry. This, that and the other (talk) 03:42, 14 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

@This, that and the other I undeleted them. Benwing2 (talk) 18:19, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I don't think there is any controversy here so I'll strike this section. This, that and the other (talk) 02:15, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply


Attested

edit

Augustine attests the verbal noun genitive form as volendī. https://latin.stackexchange.com/questions/11279/was-there-ever-a-difference-between-volo-and-volo Kwékwlos (talk) 00:32, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Dubious. With all due respect to the TLFi, volendi does not confirm *volēre over *volĕre, or even any significant change from velle, as nothing has been replaced (the verb did not have a gerund in CL, so one was later supplied).
That said, I will try to see if there are actual attestations of *volēre. You'd think there would be for a verb with such a common meaning. Nicodene (talk) 01:11, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Reichenau attests si voles. Kwékwlos (talk) 12:28, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Return to "Latin/voleo" page.