Nicodene
ladin question
editI've seen you've based yourself on Hull's thesis in fusing rhaeto-romance and gallo-italic (as well as istriot) on most wiktionary pages. Is it actually consensual? Checking on google scholar only brings up 23 citations, which isn't a lot for a 40 years old thesis. 92.88.170.251 92.88.170.251 15:57, 3 January 2025 (UTC) just to be clear, i wasn't signed in when writing thatΟυώρντΑρτ (talk)
- Separating them isn’t a matter of consensus either (see: Questione Ladina). As far as I am aware, there are zero innovations that unite Romansh, Friulian, and Ladin which are not also attested in neighbouring Gallo-Italic. Nicodene (talk) 23:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
It would not be a second independent episode. My use of "also" meant as an alternative, roughly equally likely and equally un(dis)provable scenario, not as an addition to the same scenario. — 2600:4808:9C31:4800:7CF5:7CB:5C36:C8C0 00:16, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- If it is not independent of dunc, then one has to account for dunc as some kind of secondary development from *dunquam. The problem is that dunc is attested no less than eight times („achtmal“) in Roman inscriptions, and *dunquam zero times. Nicodene (talk) 03:08, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Sută/sutã in Romanian and Aromanian
edit- (discussion moved to here)
Just a gentle reminder to check CAT:E: there are 12 Aragonese entries there because of your edit to this module. It looks like you eliminated a subroutine without removing the references to it elsewhere in the code. My Lua skills aren't enough to fix this myself even if I knew what you were trying to do. Thanks! Chuck Entz (talk) 03:07, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Chuck Entz Thanks for telling me. I've cleaned up the 12 entries in question. Nicodene (talk) 03:14, 17 May 2025 (UTC)