Talk:fucile da cecchino
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Metaknowledge in topic RFD discussion: December 2021–February 2022
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
Tagged but not listed (diff by @Imetsia). --Fytcha (talk) 00:10, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Tagged but not listed (diff by @Imetsia). --Fytcha (talk) 00:10, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- (Notifying Benwing2, GianWiki, SemperBlotto, Ultimateria, Jberkel, Imetsia, Sartma): Opinions on these? — Fytcha〈 T | L | C 〉 11:48, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep both SemperBlotto (talk) 12:03, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep both. — GianWiki (talk) 17:27, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete both, of course. I have the memory that I proposed deleting these before, and they both passed RFD; but maybe we didn't de-tag it appropriately? Or maybe my memory is just totally wrong? Imetsia (talk) 19:14, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
- Weak keep. I also think we've seen these before. Ultimateria (talk) 07:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- I lean towards keep, on the theory that a fucile di precisione seems to be not just any arbitrary high-precision rifle but a specific type of rifle; similarly with fucile da cecchino and sniper rifle. Benwing2 (talk) 00:00, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
- Both RFD-kept (again?). —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 18:07, 4 February 2022 (UTC)