Talk:solar energetic particles
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Ungoliant MMDCCLXIV in topic solar energetic particles
The following information passed a request for deletion.
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
They are (deprecated template usage) solar (deprecated template usage) energetic (deprecated template usage) particles. SemperBlotto 17:17, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- keep. This belongs to the vocabulary of English. The existence of the acronym SEP is an evidence. Wikipedia provides a definition. Lmaltier 22:21, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- Could this possibly be an argument similar to WT:COALMINE? —CodeCat 22:52, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- No. We have acronyms for all sorts of crap that should never be included. -- Liliana • 22:59, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- Note that singular solar energetic particle is missing. --Hekaheka 04:34, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
- No. We have acronyms for all sorts of crap that should never be included. -- Liliana • 22:59, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- Could this possibly be an argument similar to WT:COALMINE? —CodeCat 22:52, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- Weak keep. May be a technical term, but energetic solar particles is also prevalent in Google Books. There's a stronger case for solar energetic particle events which is more common in that order and seems more idiomatic anyway. DAVilla 16:05, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Keep, agree with assessment of DAVilla (talk • contribs) regarding Google Books analysis. -- Cirt (talk) 23:47, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Kept. — Ungoliant (Falai) 02:07, 13 August 2012 (UTC)