Talk:winesop

Latest comment: 12 years ago by -sche in topic RFV discussion: March 2012

RFV discussion: March 2012

edit
 

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for verification (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Any takers? Seems to be a Scrabble word. Needs formatting if OK. SemperBlotto (talk) 22:11, 15 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Done, but I can't guarantee that the formatting's right. --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 03:03, 16 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
and I've formatted your quotations; thanks for adding them! :) - -sche (discuss) 03:13, 16 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Actually, I discern two meanings from the citations in the entry and on Google Books: "something edible" (so, perhaps not rags), and "a drunkard". I'm temporarily restoring the RFV tag, until we can see if the original sense ("rags") is attestable. - -sche (discuss) 03:18, 16 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
I thought they were talking about a grape varietal for the most part. The first citation seems to support the definition; the other two are just uses as a derogatory term. --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 03:20, 16 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
(Sorry, I didn't see that you had cleaned it up. Never mind.) --Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 03:21, 16 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, the second sense (drunkard) does seem to be an insult. I can't figure out how to note that... I suppose just "(used as an insult)"? I don't think the original sense ("rags") is attested. - -sche (discuss) 03:34, 16 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
I've put "derogatory" on it. Equinox 18:54, 16 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
I've deleted the "rags" sense. I think we've found all the quotations we're going to find, and they only support the other two senses. So: two senses added and cited and kept, one sense (the original sense) RFV-failed. - -sche (discuss) 04:40, 19 March 2012 (UTC)Reply


Return to "winesop" page.