Velociraptor888
multiple edits edit
Please use the "Show preview" button. Only when you are happy with the result, use the "Save page" button. SemperBlotto (talk) 17:12, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
I'm not convinced that your inflection of this defective verb is correct. For instance, you now have a different infinitive on the headword and the inflection table. SemperBlotto (talk) 16:50, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Yeah. I tried to fix it but I failed. I just saw a messy bit and edited it, but to no avail. Sorry. Velociraptor888 (talk) 16:54, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
P.S.: I am not really that good with templates. Please can you fix it? :) Velociraptor888 (talk) 16:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
Utar Pradexe edit
The Portuguese Wikipedia is not a valid source for citing Portuguese words. The name Utar Pradexe is simply not used enough in Portuguese to warrant inclusion. — Ungoliant (falai) 21:13, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry. The Portuguese Wikipedia does have a link of its own to a book or something like that, but I think I should probably just not do anything more with this. Velociraptor888 07:03, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
- The book they link to is an encyclopaedic dictionary, meaning that the term is probably being mentioned, instead of used.
- Anyway, I have learned not to rely ptwiki for the existence of a given spelling. They don’t mind making words up nor perpetuating made-up words. — Ungoliant (falai) 14:39, 27 October 2014 (UTC)