Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2015-05/User:Celestianpower for de-sysop

User:Celestianpower for de-sysop edit

User inactive since 2010. User:Celestianpower is the userpage

  • Vote starts: 15 May 2015
  • Vote ends: 15 June 2015

Support removing sysop rights edit

  1.   Support as nom. --Type56op9 (talk) 11:53, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Support. No administrative actions executed since October 2010 either. He did make a Wikipedia edit in February, 2015, so he’s probably not dead. He’s still quite inactive, though. --Romanophile (talk) 15:41, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Support. --Dixtosa (talk) 15:21, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  4.   Support. Clearly inactive here. bd2412 T 17:26, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Support Equinox 20:52, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Support SemperBlotto (talk) 13:37, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose removing sysop rights edit

  1.   Oppose per Dan Polansky. I know he voted Abstain, but his reasons are good enough for me to oppose. --Daniel 06:09, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Abstain removing sysop rights edit

  1.   Abstain The magic keyword {{NUMBEROFADMINS}} gives 105 admins. There is no risk that removing admin rights creates unhealthy concentration of power. Last edit was 21 October 2010, so close to 5 years passed. Okay with me. --Dan Polansky (talk) 15:07, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Abstain I would like to say thank you to everyone for allowing me to be part of the community for the time I was. I had a blast. I am highly unlikely to go on some wild deleting/blocking spree, but equally unlikely to become an active contributor to Wiktionary again in the near future due to personal reasons, so I fully understand why one would wish that I were no longer a sysop. I wish the project all the luck in the future. —Celestianpower háblame 23:58, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decision edit

Passes 6–1. We need a b'rat.​—msh210 (talk) 04:05, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. —Stephen (Talk) 06:30, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]