Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2019-04/User:Jyril for unadminization

Nomination: I hereby nominate Jyril (talk • contribs) to be un-Adminned. No edits in 5 years.

Comment: This should not be a vote, we have already established the criteria for de-sysoping. It is up to the bureaucrats to make the change. - TheDaveRoss 23:37, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This vote should be delete. --{{victar|talk}} 06:20, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Schedule:

Conditional support if the desysopping will not take place before May 15, so that Jyril have about a month to respond, otherwise oppose. ~~←₰-→~~ Lingo ^Bingo _Dingo (talk) 08:06, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The warning issued seems suspicious to me: "Hey, to shake things up I'm gonna try to have you de-adminned." According to the Jyril's Global contributions, they seem to have at least visited in 2017, which means that it's worth issuing a proper warning before doing this. פֿינצטערניש (Fintsternish), she/her (talk) 23:31, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose having this vote: There should be no more votes on inactivity-driven desysopping since there is a policy. Let a bureaucrat implement the policy Wiktionary:Votes/pl-2017-03/Desysopping for inactivity without a per-admin vote. I hope enough opposes could lead to a snowball closure of this vote. For the unacquainted, User:I learned some phrases could be Wonderfool, a multiuser editor who was repeatedly blocked yet repeatedly tolerated who liked to create these kinds of desysopping votes, and no longer had the pleasure since the policy was established. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:35, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Desysopped without the need for a vote - can be resysopped if he returns. SemperBlotto (talk) 06:24, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]