-오
KoreanEdit
EtymologyEdit
See the main entry.
PronunciationEdit
- (SK Standard/Seoul) IPA(key): [o̞]
- Phonetic hangul: [오]
Romanizations | |
---|---|
Revised Romanization? | o |
Revised Romanization (translit.)? | o |
McCune–Reischauer? | o |
Yale Romanization? | o |
SuffixEdit
오 • (-o)
- Post-vowel and post-ㄹ (l) allomorphic form of 소 (-so, “semi-formal style sentence-final suffix”).
Usage notesEdit
- For comments regarding the relationship between 소 (-so) and 오 (-o) in the imperative mood, see "Usage notes" at 소 (-so).
Middle KoreanEdit
Etymology 1Edit
PronunciationEdit
Yin-form | 우 (-wu) |
---|---|
Yang-form | 오 (-wo) |
SuffixEdit
오 (-wo)
- Yang-vowel form of 우 (-wu, adverb-deriving suffix)
Etymology 2Edit
Lenition in voiced environments. See Appendix:Koreanic reconstructions for more.
PronunciationEdit
SuffixEdit
오〮 (-Gwó)
- Lenited allomorphic form of 고〮 (-kwó, verbal connective suffix) (in certain voiced environments)
Usage notesEdit
- This allomorph only occurs after coda liquid /-l/, a falling diphthong, the copula 이 (i-), or the passivizing auxiliary 디 (ti-). The velar stop is preserved before all other vowels.[1]
Etymology 3Edit
Lenition in voiced environments. See Appendix:Koreanic reconstructions for more.
PronunciationEdit
ParticleEdit
오〮 (-(G)wó)
- Lenited allomorphic form of 고〮 (-kwo, non-polar interrogative marker) (in certain voiced environments)
Usage notesEdit
- This allomorph is obligatory after /-j/, /-i/, or /-l/ (note that the irrealis suffix /-lQ/ is excluded here). It sometimes appears before other vowels as well.[1]
- It was sometimes pronounced as /-ɣo/ and sometimes as /-o/, as can be perceived from orthographic variation between e.g. ᄒᆞ리〮오〮 (hò-lí-Gwó) and ᄒᆞ료〮 (hò-ly-wó).
See alsoEdit
Middle Korean sentence enders | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Form | Mood | Notes | Applied to 셔 (sye-, “to stand”) | ||||
다〮 (-tá) 라〮 (-lá) |
Declarative | Unmarked | 셔다〮 (Yale: syètá) | ||||
마〮 (-má) | Promissive | 셔우〮마〮 (Yale: syèwúmá) | |||||
ㄴ (-n) | 다〮 (-tá) | Interrogative | Realis | Obligatory for second-person (2P) subject | 션다〮 (Yale: syèntá) | ||
가〮 (-ka) | Polar question, non-2P subject | 션가〮 (Yale: syènká) | |||||
고〮 (-kwo) | Wh-word question, non-2P subject | 션고〮 (Yale: syènkwó) | |||||
ㅭ (-lq) | 다〮 (-tá) | Irrealis | Obligatory for 2P subject | 셜따〮 (Yale: syèlttá) | |||
가〮 (-ká) | Polar question, non-2P subject | 셜까〮 (Yale: syèlkká) | |||||
고〮 (-kwó) | Wh-word question, non-2P subject | 셜꼬〮 (Yale: syèlkkwó) | |||||
니〮 (-ní) | 아〮 (-Gá) | Realis | Non-honorific | Polar question | 셔니〮아〮 (Yale: syèníGá), 셔녀〮 (Yale: syènyé) | ||
오〮 (-Gwó) | Non-polar question | 셔니〮오〮 (Yale: syèníGwó), 셔뇨〮 (Yale: syènywó) | |||||
ㅅ (-s) | 가〮 (-ká) | Deferential | No polarity distinction | 셔닛〮가〮 (Yale: syèníská) | |||
ᅌᅵᆺ (-ngì-s) | Highly deferential | 셔니〮ᅌᅵᆺ가〮 (Yale: syèníngìská) | |||||
리〮 (-lí) | 아〮 (-Gá) | Irrealis | Non-honorific | Polar question | 셔리〮아〮 (Yale: syèlíGá), 셔려〮 (Yale: syèlyé) | ||
오〮 (-Gwó) | Non-polar question | 셔리〮오〮 (Yale: syèlíGwó), 셔료〮 (Yale: syèlywó) | |||||
ㅅ (-s) | 가〮 (-ká) | Deferential | No polarity distinction | 셔릿〮가〮 (Yale: syèlíská) | |||
ᅌᅵᆺ (-ngì-s) | Highly deferentiall | 셔리〮ᅌᅵᆺ가〮 (Yale: syèlíngìská) | |||||
라〮 (-lá) | Imperative | Ordering | Non-honorific | 셔라〮 (Yale: syèlá) | |||
아〮쎠〮 (-ássyé) 어〮쎠〮 (-éssyé) |
Deferential | 셔〮쎠〮 (Yale: syéssyé) | |||||
쇼〮셔〮 (-syósyé) | Highly deferential | 셔쇼〮셔〮 (Yale: syèsyósyé) | |||||
고〮 (-kwó) 오〮 (-Gwó) |
라〮 (-lá) | Requesting | Non-honorific | 셔고〮라〮 (Yale: syèkwólá) | |||
려〮 (-lyé) | Deferential | 셔고〮려〮 (Yale: syèkwólyé) | |||||
ᅌᅵ (-ngì) | 다〮 (-tá) | Highly deferential | 셔고〮ᅌᅵ다〮 (Yale: syèkwóngìtá) | ||||
져〮 (-cyé) | Propositive | Plain | 셔져〮 (Yale: syècyé) | ||||
사〮 (-sá) | ᅌᅵ (-ngì) | 다〮 (-tá) | Deferential | 셔사〮ᅌᅵ다〮 (Yale: syèsángìtá) | |||
ㄴ (-n) | 뎌〮 (-tyé) | Exclamatory | Self-honoring | 션뎌〮 (Yale: syèntyé) | |||
ㅭ (-lq) | 셔〮 (-syé) | 셜쎠〮 (Yale: syèlssyé) | |||||
고〮나〮 (-kwóná) | Only sixteenth century | 셔고〮나〮 (Yale: syèkwóná) | |||||
Based on 나찬연 2020, 중세 국어의 이해; Lee and Ramsey 2011, History of the Korean Language. Morphological segmentation of the verbal paradigm sometimes differs between analyses. The list is not exhaustive. |