Talk:vast right-wing conspiracy
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Smuconlaw in topic RFD discussion: October–November 2016
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
At first I didn't know what this meant, but then I found that we actually have entries for single words, like vast, right-wing, and conspiracy and then everything made a lot more sense. --WikiTiki89 20:31, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. - TheDaveRoss 21:02, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- "If there's one type of piracy I don't like, it's CONS-piracy!" This seems more like something for Wikiquote. Delete. Equinox ◑ 21:04, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- I'd also like to point out my amazement at the fact that this entry and the entry for media bias survived essentially unchanged since 2007. --WikiTiki89 21:15, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- I've turned up about 50 dubious entries so far while going through everything that doesn't have a plural. I can't reasonably RFV any more right now so I have created a ton of sceptical bookmarks. Equinox ◑ 21:22, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, of course. — SMUconlaw (talk) 21:56, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, it's a conspiracy which is simultaneously right-wing and vast (which just means large or big). Renard Migrant (talk) 16:28, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. - -sche (discuss) 17:07, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Abstain. I can understand having an entry for right-wing conspiracy, but why a vast one? DonnanZ (talk) 18:03, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- From the creator's point of view: because it's the particular phrase used by H.Clinton. That's why I suggested it's more Wikiquote than Wiktionary material. Equinox ◑ 18:05, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- It's not dictionary material in its current form in the most liberal of dictionaries (Wiktionary doesn't qualify as being liberal). DonnanZ (talk) 18:15, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Do you mean liberal sense 5, or sense 6? bd2412 T 21:51, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- A mixture of both, half of one and half of the other. DonnanZ (talk) 23:36, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- Do you mean liberal sense 5, or sense 6? bd2412 T 21:51, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- It's not dictionary material in its current form in the most liberal of dictionaries (Wiktionary doesn't qualify as being liberal). DonnanZ (talk) 18:15, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- From the creator's point of view: because it's the particular phrase used by H.Clinton. That's why I suggested it's more Wikiquote than Wiktionary material. Equinox ◑ 18:05, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
- OK, delete this, I would prefer the restoration of media bias. DonnanZ (talk) 12:53, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
- Deleted as patently SoP. — SMUconlaw (talk) 06:54, 4 November 2016 (UTC)