Name

edit

@justinrleung I did such edit because I see Google images results are all bottles of wine. I think it is like beer bottle. Dokurrat (talk) 02:37, 9 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Dokurrat: What about wines of other fruits or of rice? I don't think the translations need to be exact. — justin(r)leung (t...) | c=› } 02:39, 9 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Justinrleung: You're right ! By the way, I don't think rice alcohol bottle has that concave bottom like wine bottle. Dokurrat (talk) 02:42, 9 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Dokurrat: I think 葡萄酒瓶 is just the prototype of wine bottles (in English), just like a sparrow/robin is the prototype of birds, but that doesn't make ostriches or penguins not birds. Likewise, I would consider rice wine bottles to be wine bottles as well, though it's probably not the first thing that comes to mind. — justin(r)leung (t...) | c=› } 02:47, 9 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

RFD discussion: November 2019–June 2020

edit
 

The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


SOP. Canonicalization (talk) 13:47, 1 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Definition made me cry laughing. Are bottles normally made of glass? and not wood? well fuck me. Delete. Equinox 10:16, 3 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
I’ve seen plastic wine bottles.  --Lambiam 21:15, 3 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
And you will see plenty of (full) plastic cider bottles in an off-licence. DonnanZ (talk) 11:16, 4 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
Weak keep due to typical characteristic shape/appearance/material. Mihia (talk) 20:49, 4 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
If using that criteria, then there should be Alsace bottle, Bordeaux bottle, Burgundy bottle, Champagne bottle, Port bottle, and Provence bottle (with or without capitals as appropriate), each of which has its own distinctive shape.[1] -Mike (talk) 23:59, 4 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
I'm not personally familiar with all of those, but if the regional ones have some distinctive or recognisable characteristic besides merely coming from that region, and the type-of-drink ones have a distinctive or recognisable characteristic besides just containing the stated type of drink, then they are eligible for inclusion IMO. Mihia (talk) 00:33, 5 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
comment: a wine bottle is not a bottle of wine. --Vealhurl (talk) 21:38, 15 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Vealhurl A wine bottle may not always be a bottle of wine, but it is a bottle for wine. PseudoSkull (talk) 07:03, 2 June 2020 (UTC)Reply
In some languages it depends on whether it's full or empty. DonnanZ (talk) 19:45, 2 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Keep as translation target. Also have edited def to incorporate some of the characteristic features of a wine bottle. - Sonofcawdrey (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Sonofcawdrey: What are the translations that support WT:THUB? --Dan Polansky (talk) 12:58, 6 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Dan Polansky: Ah, seems I didn't really understand WT:THUB regs. So, I suppose none of the translations listed qualify (except perhaps Slovene: buteljka). - Sonofcawdrey (talk) 07:53, 7 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Keep per WT:COALMINE: winebottle is citable. – Einstein2 (talk) 17:05, 23 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Keep DonnanZ (talk) 19:45, 2 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Keep- perDonnanz at 19:45, 2 May 2020 John Cross (talk) 06:41, 2 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Delete. When people think of a wine bottle, they are first and foremost thinking of a bottle (for) wine. They are not thinking of a bottle of a very specific shape/appearance/material. I was going to use cardboard box as a similar example of something that could be said to have a very specific shape and appearance, except that is an entry too! Somehow... And so is water glass (first sense). Thankfully soda can, plastic cup, and coke bottle aren't entries yet (the latter not as a noun). PseudoSkull (talk) 06:56, 2 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Kept: no consensus for deletion. PUC10:21, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

SOP. Canonicalization (talk) 13:49, 1 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Delete. Equinox 10:18, 3 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
Beer bottles generally have a different size and shape to wine bottles, and not forgetting milk bottles which are also different. Maybe some images would be useful. DonnanZ (talk) 14:49, 4 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
I could see this and the abovementioned entry meeting the fried egg test. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 15:52, 4 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
Weak keep due to typical characteristic shape/appearance/material. I would say that water bottle probably has less claim than either wine bottle or beer bottle, since AFAIK there is nothing distinctive about a water bottle except that it contains water (or, as the entry helpfully informs us, "other drinks"). Mihia (talk) 21:05, 4 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
I ought to add, of course, that the present definition, "A bottle designed to contain beer", is pure SoP and does not explain any additional distinguishing characteristics that might make it otherwise. Mihia (talk) 02:47, 5 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
Keep per WT:COALMINE: beerbottle is citable. – Einstein2 (talk) 18:28, 23 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Keep DonnanZ (talk) 19:18, 2 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Delete, per my reasoning for wine bottle. PseudoSkull (talk) 06:56, 2 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Kept: no consensus for deletion. PUC10:21, 29 June 2020 (UTC)Reply