WelcomeEdit

Hello, welcome to Wiktionary, and thank you for your contributions so far.

If you are unfamiliar with wiki-editing, take a look at Help:How to edit a page. It is a concise list of technical guidelines to the wiki format we use here: how to, for example, make text boldfaced or create hyperlinks. Feel free to practice in the sandbox. If you would like a slower introduction we have a short tutorial.

These links may help you familiarize yourself with Wiktionary:

  • Entry layout (EL) is a detailed policy on Wiktionary's page formatting; all entries must conform to it. The easiest way to start off is to copy the contents of an existing same-language entry, and then adapt it to fit the entry you are creating.
  • Check out Language considerations to find out more about how to edit for a particular language.
  • Our Criteria for Inclusion (CFI) defines exactly which words can be added to Wiktionary; the most important part is that Wiktionary only accepts words that have been in somewhat widespread use over the course of at least a year, and citations that demonstrate usage can be asked for when there is doubt.
  • If you already have some experience with editing our sister project Wikipedia, then you may find our guide for Wikipedia users useful.
  • If you have any questions, bring them to Wiktionary:Information desk or ask me on my talk page.
  • Whenever commenting on any discussion page, please sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~) which automatically produces your username and timestamp.
  • You are encouraged to add a BabelBox to your userpage to indicate your self-assessed knowledge of languages.

Enjoy your stay at Wiktionary! -- Chuck Entz (talk) 22:14, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. I know wikipedia well (3671 edits in various wiki projects, since 2006), but wiktionary less so. -- Womtelo (talk) 22:37, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

QuattuorEdit

Inclusion of borrowings in descendants lists might be debatable (feel free to discuss it at the Beer parlour), but creating new headers definitely isn't. That's a cure that's far worse than the disease.

The real issue here is being consistent with the practice in other entries, and not making up new rules based on one person's opinion of one item in one entry. Semantics isn't really an issue, because descendants lists more often than not contain descendants whose semantics have shifted in various directions. Borrowing isn't, either, since we regularly include descendants which come to the destination languages by a variety of different routes. As long as it's made clear (as in this case) that it's not an inherited term, there's no reason to exclude it. Chuck Entz (talk) 22:14, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your explanations. Womtelo (talk) 22:37, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Also, "quatre" isn't omitted. --kc_kennylau (talk) 04:19, 26 November 2016 (UTC)