Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2011-01/User:Leasnam for admin

User:Leasnam for admin edit

Support edit

  1.   Support Mglovesfun (talk) 20:59, 15 January 2011 (UTC). With a little caution. I think he has things to learn regarding Wiktionary norms, but I'm very encouraged by his ability to discuss rationally and listen to what people are saying on his talk page. He has good personal qualities. Mglovesfun (talk) 20:59, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Support Ƿidsiþ 21:02, 15 January 2011 (UTC), as above. He is not totally there on the formatting but is willing to discuss and seems to have plenty to contribute. Ƿidsiþ 21:02, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Support Downunder 21:26, 15 January 2011 (UTC) No new admins since April? That's not normal --Downunder 21:26, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  4.   Support why not? -- Prince Kassad 21:31, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Support per Mglovesfun and Ƿidsiþ. —RuakhTALK 22:48, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Support Equinox 22:56, 15 January 2011 (UTC) He seems knowledgeable and I thought he was already an admin. Equinox 22:56, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  7.   Support, but please don't use your new powers to spank User:Flibjib8. --Vahag 05:06, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Seconded. Mglovesfun (talk) 14:59, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Support per Widsith.​—msh210 (talk) 05:20, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  9.   SupportInternoob (DiscCont) 18:27, 16 January 2011 (UTC) Sure.[reply]
  10.   Support per Mglovesfun and Widsidth. --Dan Polansky 14:52, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  11.   Support —Stephen (Talk) 17:28, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  12.   Support The uſer hight Bogorm converſation 14:43, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  13.   Support Leasnam 07:07, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose edit

Abstain edit

  1.   Abstain SemperBlotto 15:08, 21 January 2011 (UTC) - no evidence of proto-admin behaviour (countering vandalism etc.)[reply]
  2.   Abstain Neskayagawonisgv? 18:21, 23 January 2011 (UTC) per SB. Maybe in a few months. --Neskayagawonisgv? 18:21, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decision edit