Reconstruction talk:Latin/quomo

Attested

See main page. Kwékwlos (talk) 14:31, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

@Nicodene Kwékwlos (talk) 11:55, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

@Nicodene Kwékwlos (talk) 17:35, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

What do you want me to do? I don't have deletion powers. I agree it's attested. Nicodene (talk) 17:37, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

RFD discussion: March 2023

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

Reconstruction:Latin/quomo

Latin. — This unsigned comment was added by Kwékwlos (talk • contribs) at 17:45, 9 March 2023 (UTC).

If it’s attested, you can just add citations at quomo and use the speedy deletion template for this.--Urszag (talk) 20:14, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

I'd like a clearer quotation of the claimed attestation before proceeding here. Compare como, to which the same treatment has been extended. This, that and the other (talk) 02:23, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Attested in various inscriptions according to the FEW. One of the references there, Pirson, is available on archive.org and gives a range of citations. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 03:49, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Delete. Should've been ages ago. Nicodene (talk) 09:10, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Delete..

Kwékwlos (talk) 09:23, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Deleted. Vininn126 (talk) 22:04, 16 March 2023 (UTC)