Talk:foreign currency

RFD discussion: May–August 2017

The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.

---

foreign currency

foreign + currency -- Pedrianaplant (talk) 09:28, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

• Delete as SoP. — SMUconlaw (talk) 09:40, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
• Delete as SoP. Morgengave (talk) 13:04, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. bd2412 T 01:33, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
• Keep as a translation target in Category:English non-idiomatic translation targets using {{translation only}} for translations, such as Japanese: 外貨 (ja) (がいか, gaika). The number of idiomatic translations warrant this. Non-idiomatic translations can be broken up into components, e.g. Russian: иностра́нная валю́та f (inostránnaja valjúta), if they are kept or added later. --Anatoli T. ^{(обсудить}/^вклад) 01:57, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

• Delete, as I don't believe translation-only entries should exist (though the community disagrees with me). PseudoSkull (talk) 02:00, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
• Delete, because the translation target argument is silly. —Μετάknowledge^{discuss/deeds} 04:18, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

• Keep per Anatoli. DonnanZ (talk) 07:48, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
• Keep. Silly or not, we have a number of "translation targets" already. Our policies and practices should not be applied in a haphazard manner. It seems that many of the translations are also SOP's but for example Catalan divisa is not. --Hekaheka (talk) 13:32, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
• Keep per Anatoli. Some SOPs still deserve translation-only entries.--Jusjih (talk) 02:00, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
• Keep as a translation hub, and thus per Anatoli. I count Hungarian deviza toward the rationale but not German Fremdwährung. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:08, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Sidebar: clarity on "translation targets", redux

See #Sidebar: clarity on "translation targets" above. Aren't we ready for a full discussion and vote on this issue yet? — SMUconlaw (talk) 09:27, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

• RFD kept: no consensus for deletion: 5:6 (keep:delete). --Dan Polansky (talk) 16:50, 6 August 2017 (UTC)