Talk:foreign currency
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Dan Polansky in topic RFD discussion: May–August 2017
The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).
This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.
foreign + currency -- Pedrianaplant (talk) 09:28, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as SoP. — SMUconlaw (talk) 09:40, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as SoP. Morgengave (talk) 13:04, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. bd2412 T 01:33, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep as a translation target in Category:English non-idiomatic translation targets using
{{translation only}}
for translations, such as Japanese: 外貨 (ja) (がいか, gaika). The number of idiomatic translations warrant this. Non-idiomatic translations can be broken up into components, e.g. Russian: иностра́нная валю́та f (inostránnaja valjúta), if they are kept or added later. --Anatoli T. (обсудить/вклад) 01:57, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, as I don't believe translation-only entries should exist (though the community disagrees with me). PseudoSkull (talk) 02:00, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, because the translation target argument is silly. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 04:18, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per Anatoli. DonnanZ (talk) 07:48, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Silly or not, we have a number of "translation targets" already. Our policies and practices should not be applied in a haphazard manner. It seems that many of the translations are also SOP's but for example Catalan divisa is not. --Hekaheka (talk) 13:32, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per Anatoli. Some SOPs still deserve translation-only entries.--Jusjih (talk) 02:00, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep as a translation hub, and thus per Anatoli. I count Hungarian deviza toward the rationale but not German Fremdwährung. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:08, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Sidebar: clarity on "translation targets", redux
editSee #Sidebar: clarity on "translation targets" above. Aren't we ready for a full discussion and vote on this issue yet? — SMUconlaw (talk) 09:27, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
- RFD kept: no consensus for deletion: 5:6 (keep:delete). --Dan Polansky (talk) 16:50, 6 August 2017 (UTC)