Talk:neon

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Dan Polansky in topic RFD discussion: October–December 2018

merged with translations found on http://elements.vanderkrogt.net/elem/ne.html

I would like to thank Peter for being so generous to set them free. He would appreciate it, if we send him corrections or additions.Polyglot 01:06, 25 Dec 2003 (UTC)

RFD discussion: October–December 2018 edit

 

The following information passed a request for deletion (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Once again the adjective is a noun modifier. I wonder whether these can be moved to the noun without sending them to RFD. As shown in Oxford:

1.3[as modifier] Very bright or fluorescent in colour.
‘she had recently dyed her hair neon pink’
So the definition isn't wrong, it's merely in the wrong place. DonnanZ (talk) 09:14, 5 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
The OED has an adjective section (described as "attributive") - "orig. U.S. Of or resembling a neon light, esp. in being brilliantly coloured; bright, gaudy, glowing." SemperBlotto (talk) 09:17, 5 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
You didn't say what to keep it as. DonnanZ (talk) 17:45, 5 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
As an adjective. Purplebackpack89 21:53, 10 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Keep as an adjective, in an adjective section; I am talking of the sense "That resembles a neon light; extremely bright; fluorescent". Thus, keep "as is". First, I would rank it as an adjective since that is how it behaves. Let me remind that there are incomparable adjectives, e.g. lumbar. Second, it is entered as an adjective in M-W[1], AHD[2] and Macmillan[3]; OTOH other solution is chosen by oxforddictionaries.com[4], --Dan Polansky (talk) 21:20, 5 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
Delete per previous discussions on similar cases. Per utramque cavernam 15:31, 17 October 2018 (UTC)Reply
@Per utramque cavernam: That's a woefully inadequate identification of reasons located elsewhere. Can you link us to least one such discussion of another case? And was the case really similar in all pertinent regards? --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:44, 20 October 2018 (UTC)Reply


Return to "neon" page.