Question re: unattested forms of determiners
Hey! Sorry about that little fail you cleaned up after me with the forms of sa, I took the hint and did the sah forms right :) Was wondering though, I accidentally created an entry for 𐌸𐍉𐌶𐌿𐌷 (þōzuh) which, judging by the lack of a romanization, is probably unattested - should entries like that be created? (If not, feel free to delete it.)
The feminine and neuter forms should probably link to the masculine form, as they form a single paradigm that is clearly similar to that of adjectives. I think the first and second person pronouns should be kept separate though. Some people treat the singular (I) and plural (we) as part of one lemma, but I don't know if that makes sense.
We shouldn't have entries for unattested forms, at least that's the norm we've stuck with for Gothic. I deleted the entry.