Nota bene: If you leave a message here, I will reply here. If I leave a message on your page, please reply there as I will be watching for it.
- Yes - I had been thinking this through overnight and it was my first port of call this morning. Thanks — Saltmarshσυζήτηση-talk 05:37, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
This one revolves around the credibility of the 1770 source given by the IP who added this sense. I suspect it might be (early) Modern Greek in polytonic script rather than Ancient Greek, as claimed. Your input would be most welcome. Chuck Entz (talk) 07:19, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
I am not so sure how to answer (and if I have a real answer...). But οφείλω (as well as homonym χρωστώ) does not have a perfective form since its sense is somehow continuous. (Or someone can say the exact opposite, that sense is once done, but no one can think it with both senses...).
"εξεγείρω" can have continuous and non continuous senses: "εξήγειρα once" someone, and "εξήγειρα continuously, every day". --Xoristzatziki (talk) 07:26, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi Saltmarsh. An anon. nominated for speedy deletion επίμονως (epímonos), which you created. I rolled back his change, but I note that the lemma, επίμονα (epímona), lists επιμόνως (epimónos) as a variant spelling. Which placing of the tonos is correct? — I.S.M.E.T.A. 16:41, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- I agree - I clicked "undo" by mistake, and then got sidetracked in my 2nd edit and forgot to put things right! — Saltmarshσυζήτηση-talk 04:40, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
- I don't think you were a thousand miles away - it probably is a reborrowing, but I haven't seen any evidence — Saltmarshσυζήτηση-talk 05:29, 28 July 2015 (UTC)