SupportEquinox◑ 00:08, 14 November 2011 (UTC) After being ranted at below! Yes, I suppose it doesn't matter who made the nomination or why, and the nominee being slightly uncertain is not necessarily a bad thing because it suggests a good sense of caution. Equinox◑00:08, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Among current admins, we have CodeCat, yourself, and Pharamp who list themselves in their preferences as female; among former admins, Logomaniac does. There are two other current admins who I suspect may be female (but whom I don't wish to mention, since obviously they don't want to list themselves as such).—msh210℠ (talk) 19:47, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
User:Dvortygirl is not very active, but is a female bureaucrat (I've seen her picture) and more importantly in my view, she's an engineer...not that either fact has anything to do with being a good admin or bureaucrat. --Enginear02:02, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
My guess: Benefit of the doubt. Had you said what you did to one of those sentences, it would've made you appear to be sexist. lol — [RicLaurent] — 21:36, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Or at least the first admin formally diagnosed as autistic -- for those of us who left school many years ago, it was never considered as a possibility except for very low achievers. I suspect there are others of us here who are at least borderline autistic, but have never been diagnosed. Compared with 'pedia, we have here a much stricter format for entries, and visiting 'pedia editors are forever criticising our "poor social interaction". But most of us are happier here than there. I think that's a clue that we're not quite normal, but all that matters here is that we are good at editing a wiktionary! --Enginear02:02, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I've been (formallly?) diagnosed as autistic in at least 1995 and visiting doctors (or workers, I don't remember) monitored me in at least the early years of my life. --Lo Ximiendo10:38, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Added missing formatting. When voting, just copy and paste {{subst:support}} from the first line and it formats your yes vote for you. —Stephen(Talk)06:32, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AbstainEquinox◑ 18:32, 13 November 2011 (UTC) Nothing wrong with Lo Ximiendo, but she seems very uncertain [1]. Nominator Rockpilot, who has admitted to being Wonderfool, has a habit of starting large numbers of arbitrary bad-faith nominations. I suspect he picked her as an easy target for persuasion [2] because of her autism. Equinox◑18:32, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You're saying that she might be more easily persuaded because she has an autism spectrum disorder. I read that as meaning that because you consider her to have some kind of weakness she should be protected against Wonderfool. —CodeCat18:49, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't know she was autistic before starting the vote, and even if I had, I still would've nominated her. As for these "arbitrary bad-faith nominations", I don't consider myself to have started any so please inform me of an example (except for perhaps Razorflame, I concede that one). And I picked her because she is a long-standing reliable contributor, above all else. --Rockpilot19:05, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]