RFD discussion: April–June 2014

edit
 

The following information passed a request for deletion.

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


Both the Geordie senses are redundant to sense 1. Sense 3 indicates the present participle - in other words, it's an eye dialect of -ing - and sense 4 indicates a gerund - in other words, it's an eye dialect of -ing. Smurrayinchester (talk) 14:36, 25 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

(Before anyone suggests that maybe "-ing" is only condensed to "-in" in these specific contexts in Geordie, Google books gives plenty of evidence of Geordies eating herrin, and paying shillins, and climbing Roseberry Toppin.) Smurrayinchester (talk) 15:03, 25 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
"Roseberry Topping"? OMG I think I just found my drag queen name. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 15:31, 25 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Yes, just eye dialect, and common in many other dialects, not just Geordie. Dbfirs 08:27, 26 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Delete. Maybe a usage note listing the dialects where this eye dialect is most commonly used can be added. — Ungoliant (falai) 20:51, 27 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Delete per nom. - -sche (discuss) 01:53, 28 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Deleted/merged. - -sche (discuss) 02:51, 19 June 2014 (UTC)Reply


-in-

edit

As in Carthaginian? --Backinstadiums (talk) 08:42, 28 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

In as much as it is in imagine and imagination from image. Etymologically, it's a part of a stem that has been dropped, rather than something that has been added. (Quite how hadaš-t gave -hagin- I don't see.) I don't think it is a Latinising morpheme, even as one that allows the addition of Latin suffixes. Would even *Carthaginise (cf. fr:carthaginiser) strengthen the case? --RichardW57 (talk) 10:48, 28 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

RFC discussion: May 2016–February 2021

edit
 

The following discussion has been moved from Wiktionary:Requests for cleanup (permalink).

This discussion is no longer live and is left here as an archive. Please do not modify this conversation, but feel free to discuss its conclusions.


This needs fixing up to conform to our standard layout, with headword lines and such. —CodeCat 19:42, 4 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Closed as stale. — surjection??22:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply


Return to "-in" page.