Talk:eiusdem generis
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Surjection in topic RFD discussion: April–August 2018
The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).
It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.
Sum of parts. — Mnemosientje (t · c) 14:18, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete unless the phrase is used in languages other than Latin (the way sui generis is), in which case convert it to that/those language(s). —Mahāgaja (formerly Angr) · talk 14:30, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Seems to be a legal term. (source source source). Keep and move to English and whatever other languages it's used in. – Gormflaith (talk) 03:48, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete.
←₰-→Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 08:31, 17 April 2018 (UTC) - Delete for nominator's reason. (The English term ejusdem generis should be kept as a legal term of art.) — SGconlaw (talk) 08:45, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Never mind. Delete for now. I think it could be a rare variant of ejusdem generis, but I couldn't find any good cites; most of them were mentions, I think, rather than uses. – Gormflaith (talk) 15:04, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Version history of eiusdem generis shows it was Ejusdem generis in 2008. Move target and entry lang could simply be wrong and it could just be English ejusdem generis. English eiusdem generis could exist too, but it doesn't appear that this entry was supposed to be the English i-spelling. -84.161.42.20 20:59, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Fay Freak (talk) 00:09, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
- RFD failed. SURJECTION ·talk·contr·log· 14:35, 21 August 2018 (UTC)