RFD discussion: November 2018–January 2019

edit
 

The following information has failed Wiktionary's deletion process (permalink).

It should not be re-entered without careful consideration.


Not actually a suffix, as pointed out by Eq. Heck, the entry itself admits it's not a suffix in its usage notes. —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 05:34, 25 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Haha look at the usage notes blushing and shuffling their feet. Sorry honey, I'm not going to ask you to dance, I'm going to delete your arse. (And my comment which MK deleted because it was part of an RFD for a word that already failed was: being a common part of many compounds doesn't turn an everyday native word into a prefix. That's my rationale.) Equinox 05:54, 25 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Delete, Nazi is enough. Per utramque cavernam 12:11, 25 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Delete ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 07:53, 26 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Delete, I also believe that Nazi should be enough. --Robbie SWE (talk) 07:21, 28 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, delete. I will revise the derived terms in preparation. DonnanZ (talk) 12:33, 28 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
Probably delete. The use in blends such as [[environazi] can be analyzed as environment + Nazi, and I don't see why it should not. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:23, 27 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Deleted. bd2412 T 03:08, 29 January 2019 (UTC)Reply