包攬訴訟

Chinese

		to take on the entirety of something; to undertake the whole thing	to file a lawsuit; to litigate; to sue
trad. (包攬訴訟)		包攬	訴訟
simp. (包揽诉讼)		包揽	诉讼

Pronunciation

• Mandarin

  (Pinyin): bāolǎn sùsòng

  (Zhuyin): ㄅㄠ ㄌㄢˇ ㄙㄨˋ ㄙㄨㄥˋ

• Cantonese (Jyutping): baau¹ laam⁵ sou³ zung⁶

---

• Mandarin
  • (Standard Chinese)⁺
    • Hanyu Pinyin: bāolǎn sùsòng
    • Zhuyin: ㄅㄠ ㄌㄢˇ ㄙㄨˋ ㄙㄨㄥˋ
    • Tongyong Pinyin: baolǎn sùsòng
    • Wade–Giles: pao¹-lan³ su⁴-sung⁴
    • Yale: bāu-lǎn sù-sùng
    • Gwoyeu Romatzyh: baulaan suhsonq
    • Palladius: баолань сусун (baolanʹ susun)
    • Sinological IPA ^(key): /pɑʊ̯⁵⁵ län²¹⁴⁻²¹ su⁵¹⁻⁵³ sʊŋ⁵¹/
• Cantonese
  • (Standard Cantonese, Guangzhou–Hong Kong)⁺
    • Jyutping: baau¹ laam⁵ sou³ zung⁶
    • Yale: bāau láahm sou juhng
    • Cantonese Pinyin: baau¹ laam⁵ sou³ dzung⁶
    • Guangdong Romanization: bao¹ lam⁵ sou³ zung⁶
    • Sinological IPA ^(key): /paːu̯⁵⁵ laːm¹³ sou̯³³ t͡sʊŋ²²/

Noun

包攬訴訟

1. (Hong Kong) champerty
   • Section 98L, Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 609)

     助訟的侵權法律責任(包括包攬訴訟的侵權法律責任)，就第三者資助仲裁而言，並不適用。 [MSC, trad.]
     助讼的侵权法律责任(包括包揽诉讼的侵权法律责任)，就第三者资助仲裁而言，并不适用。 [MSC, simp.]

     Zhùsòng de qīnquán fǎlǜ zérèn (bāokuò bāolǎnsùsòng de qīnquán fǎlǜ zérèn), jiù dìsānzhě zīzhù zhòngcái éryán, bìng bù shìyòng. [Pinyin]

     The tort of maintenance (including the tort of champerty) does not apply in relation to third party funding of arbitration.

   • 2014, Legislative Council Panel on Administration of Justice and Legal Services, “LC Paper No. CB(4)486/13-14(04)”, in Documents of the Hong Kong Legislative Council‎^[1], page 1:

     訂立助訟罪行是為阻止有人“好管閒事干預”訴訟，尤其是這情況會導致以被告身分與訟的人受到壓制。 [MSC, trad.]
     订立助讼罪行是为阻止有人“好管闲事干预”诉讼，尤其是这情况会导致以被告身分与讼的人受到压制。 [MSC, simp.]

     Dìnglì zhùsòng zuìxíng shì wèi zǔzhǐ yǒurén “hǎoguǎnxiánshì gānyù” sùsòng, yóuqí shì zhè qíngkuàng huì dǎozhì yǐ bèigào shēnfēn yǔsòng de rén shòudào yāzhì. [Pinyin]

     In the Administration’s view, abolition of the common law offences of maintenance and champerty would involve broader legal and policy concerns, including those of recovery agents and litigation funding companies.