Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2021-12/User:Vininn126 for admin

User:Vininn126 for admin edit

Nomination: I hereby nominate Vininn126 (talkcontribs) as a local English Wiktionary Administrator.

Schedule:

  • Vote starts: 16:00, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
  • Vote ends: 16:00, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Acceptance: Vininn126 (talk) 16:07, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Languages: en, pl-3, ru-2
  • Timezone: UTC+01:00

Support edit

  1.   Support as nominator. —Svārtava [tcur] 16:00, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Support. Good to see more editors becoming sysops. ·~ dictátor·mundꟾ 17:02, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Support. Great editor who could stand to benefit from using the admin tools. Imetsia (talk) 17:33, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  4.   Support PseudoSkull (talk) 18:11, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  5.   Support, it is definitely useful to expand the language competencies to our admin pool. bd2412 T 20:53, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  6.   Support "XY doesn't need the tools" is not a valid argument against a nominee. Allahverdi Verdizade (talk) 21:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  7.   Support. Adminship isn't primarily about whether someone truly needs the tools, it is about whether someone can be trusted with the tools. ←₰-→ Lingo Bingo Dingo (talk) 12:22, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  8.   Support Judging by the page Wiktionary:Administrators, a diligent Polish-language editor who patrols Polish-related changes would be really useful to have. --Fytcha (talk) 12:48, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  9.   Support This user seems to ‘know his cebule’! Overlordnat1 (talk) 10:45, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  10.   Support RcAlex36 (talk) 14:38, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  11.   Support ᛙᛆᚱᛐᛁᚿᛌᛆᛌWiktionary's most active Proto-Norse editorAsk me anything 21:20, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  12.   Support. AG202 (talk) 03:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  13.   Support — justin(r)leung (t...) | c=› } 02:17, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  14.   Support PUC13:25, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  15.   Support. Vininn does a good job, keeps entries in check, and Wiktionary could use another Polish-speaking admin as said above. Hythonia (talk) 21:12, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  16.   Support Mazab IZW (talk) 16:48, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  17.   Support John Cross (talk) 10:47, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose edit

  1.   Oppose Adminship isn't a right given to distinguish good editors - for that we have whitelist. It's a set of tools that can be given to someone who would make good use of it, most notably to support order on this project. I agree that Vininn is a great editor, even more than great, but I haven't seen them reverting edits, closing RFVs and RFDs, resolving conflicts... I don't think they need admin tools for what they're doing, and you certainly don't need admin tools in order to be a good editor. Thadh (talk) 17:13, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I usually keep a close eye on the Polish recent changes, as that was my main area of focus, and tried to revert something when I saw it. As an admin, I would definitely keep an eye on more than that. I also haven't been in many RF's, as I wasn't sure it was my place, but upon recently hearing that there are a lot that need attention, I'd be willing to contribute what I can to resolving those. Vininn126 (talk) 17:35, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abstain edit

  1.   Abstain A great editor apparently, but I little see him interacting with people, tackling content disputes; I don’t like to vote for an unknown quantity, but it should be predictable what he would use the admin tools for, other than for being diverted from being a good editor, though he probably would have use for the deletion tool. Fay Freak (talk) 21:31, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  2.   Abstain: I have absolutely no idea what this user is like. DonnanZ (talk) 15:04, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3.   Abstain --Numberguy6 (talk) 21:08, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  4.   Abstain agree w/ User:Fay Freak, after the recent drama(s) we need admins who can help resolve conflicts. – Jberkel 11:32, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decision edit