Wiktionary:Word of the day/Nominations/Archive 2017

← 2016 2018 →

December 2017 edit

November 2017 edit

October 2017 edit

September 2017 edit

August 2017 edit

July 2017 edit

June 2017 edit

May 2017 edit

April 2017 edit

March 2017 edit

February 2017 edit

The expression itself is pretty innocuous. Mihia (talk) 02:12, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
But the definition will also appear on the Main Page. — SMUconlaw (talk) 18:00, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Ungoliant. —Granger (talk · contribs) 04:07, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. It is a shame, though, as this is one of my all-time favourite expressions. Mihia (talk) 21:53, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There is consensus that this isn't suitable for the Main Page. — SMUconlaw (talk) 18:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017 edit

The verb as well, I think. DonnanZ (talk) 10:47, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hm, perhaps. But the verb sense is well-known; the noun has some oddities going on which may be interesting. But if both fit, ¿por qué no los dos?Kleio (t · c) 19:07, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The point is it will be WOTD only once perhaps, so both noun and verb should be covered. DonnanZ (talk) 00:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC).[reply]
However, we generally do not feature more than one part of speech. The template is not really set up for that purpose. — SMUconlaw (talk) 17:12, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Noun and verb senses set for 4 January 2018 (birth anniversary of floral artist Junichi Kakizaki). — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:35, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]